🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation is that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.